I am for smaller states for administrative convenience. No doubt about it. But there should be a plan and basis on which states are created. It shouldn't be done on pure demand from a particular region.political party. I think my colony should be a state because, self rule will help us develop better. So based on the demand from the majority of people from my colony, should it be a state?
Hyderabad will be the capital of both states for 10 years. Nobody who owns anything in Hyderabad will be told to get out and their property rights will be respected
What is the joint capital for when the revenue can't be shared. To use assembly and secretariat? What kind of a joke is this? 60% of AP population lives in Seemandhra and you are only giving it 40% of the income? What sense does it make? Can you explain Prasen?
Comparing against the Nizam's conditions are laughable.
It is just to highlight the difference between what Telangana was and was Telangana is today. Obviously you haven't gone through Sri krishna committee report. http://pib.nic.in/archieve/others/2011/ ... 010502.pdf
, go through this report before making unnecessary allegations on the people from other part of Andhra Pradesh. And the pink you provided only gives a selfish outlook of a person who ever has come up with those points.
Just as an example, the state government has allocated the WAQF lands (which were earlier allotted for minority community development) to the real estate firm Lanco owned by congress MP from Andhra region. The dispute is still pending the court. This is the prime land in the city. Lanco today has started a 7200 crore worth real estate project called Lanco hills.
Shameful claim and one sided story. Was it allotted or Lanco bought it in open auction? Lanco bought it in public auction. The Charlotte guy is painting it as if the land is allotted to an MP from Andhra and as if he is the only beneficiary. Here is the Hindu link on the dispute http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp ... 282499.ece
. Infosys, Wipro, Microsoft, Amazon etc etc were all given lands in this area and all are in dispute. Is it wrong to give land to these companies. How conveniently the guy skipped others and only pointed out Lanco. And Lanco is not some minuscule unknown company. The company was founded in 1986 and is a billion dollar company! These opportunistic idiots couldn't even see the employment these companies generate but instead try to show a skewed picture to the entire world.
The state government in recent years has sold the government properties worth several thousand crores in the Telangana region to raise funds for the JalaYagnam projects.
Another argument put up only for convenience. It is true that the lands were sold but they were sold in Hyderabad, capital of AP to fund the irrigation projects. He is making it out as if all lands in Telangana are sold. How conveniently he only mentioned about Pothireddypadu and Polavaram, absolute idiot whoever has written it. Here is a map for projects started under Jalayagnam https://mapsengine.google.com/map/edit? ... GXrGZGl7uw
. Are the confined to Andhra only. Here is a link for Jalayagnam website. http://jalayagnam.org/index1.php
I don't even need to explain about the rest of the farce in that website. That is something which is happening in every state and through out India. Soil and water pollution in Hyderabad it seems! Doesn't that joker know there are other people also living in Hyderabad apart from Telangana and Seemandhra people. How is it injustice only to Telangana?